FBI Texts Show Systemic Leaking Used As Tool In Anti-Trump Collusion With Media

Yep, it looks like it was all collusion between people in the FBI and the mainstream media. Pre-Trump administration, when various government entities were leaking like sieves to the mainstream media, and even after Trump’s inauguration, the two groups were working together to undermine Donald Trump in any way they could. That is what the latest batch of text messages between Lisa Page and Peter Strzok are showing.

Lee Smith at Real Clear Politics breaks it down.

Past and present U.S. officials say the template for the leak campaign can be traced back to the Obama administration’s efforts to sell the 2015 Iran nuclear deal, which made the press reliant on background conversations and favorable leaks from government officials. Obama adviser Ben Rhodes told the New York Times in 2016 that “we created an echo chamber” that “helped retail the administration’s narrative.”…

RCI has found that the anti-Trump leaks fall into two broad categories, or phases. Initially the leaking was an offensive operation aimed at disrupting Trump’s agenda, especially through leaks alleging connections between his campaign and the Russians. Its early successes included leaks of highly classified material that led to the firing of National Security Adviser Michael Flynn and the recusal of Attorney General Jeff Sessions from overseeing that probe.

The second phase – which began roughly a year into the Trump administration – has been more defensive, pushing back against congressional oversight committees that had uncovered irregularities in the FBI’s investigation of Trump. This phase has been marked by the willingness of press outlets to run stories backing off earlier reported leaks that proved to be deeply misleading – including the roots of the FBI’s investigation of the Trump campaign and the relationship between Deputy Attorney General Bruce Ohr and the opposition research firm that produced a central document of that probe, the largely discredited “Steele dossier.”

This second phase has also included articles and opinion pieces – some written by journalists who have published classified information – dismissing suspicions of an orchestrated campaign against Trump as, to use the phrase invoked in a recent New Yorker article,  a “conspiracy theory.”

Anything that endangers the mainstream media narratives is labeled a “conspiracy theory.” In this case, though, plenty of censures is coming from those who served under previous Republican presidents.

“The leaks that have been coming out of the FBI and DOJ since 2016 are unconscionable,” said retired FBI supervisory special agent James Gagliano. “There’s a difference between whistleblowing and leaking for self-serving or partisan purposes.”…

“That same configuration,” said Michael Doran, a senior official in the George W. Bush White House, “the press, political operatives, newly minted experts, social media validators—was repurposed to target Trump, his campaign, transition team, then presidency.” The echo chamber’s primary instrument in attacking the current White House, said Doran, “is the Russia collusion narrative.”

And it was all based on a dossier that was justified by using news reports of leaks that were not true in the first place.

This is how the narrative was shaped, that the Trump camp colluded with Russia. And now we see that it was not true.

What is Robert Mueller doing as a special prosecutor then?

The Trump News Gazette





Be the first to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.


This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.